Section

Work


Work is one of the exhibition’s central thematic clusters. MoMA’s archives-highlights summary names “careers” as the mid-flow section following household life;1 the CNA education portal names “work” in its list of themes.2

The cluster aggregates four checklist sections that together constitute the exhibition’s sustained treatment of human labor: Section 14 LAND, Section 15 WORK (A), Section 16 WORK (B), and Section 17 WOMAN’S WORK. This four-section grouping places agrarian labor alongside industrial and domestic work, spanning continents and productive modes. Of the 74 plates, the majority fall in Sections 14 and 15; Section 17 Woman’s Work (checklist plates #189–#193) is among the exhibition’s few sections with an explicitly gendered designation.

Three photographers with documented deep-dive notes in this repository have plates in this cluster. Robert Capa contributes two USSR plates to Section 14 Land (photo-0118, checklist #124; photo-0131, checklist #137) — both posthumous contributions, as Capa died in Indochina on 25 May 1954, eight months before the exhibition opened.3 G. H. Metcalf contributes two Ireland plates to Section 14 Land (photo-0125, checklist #131; photo-0135, checklist #141), both carrying a Black Star agency and LIFE magazine dual credit.4 Ernst Haas contributes plate #154 (photo-0147, USA, Section 15 Work A), credited to Magnum and Argosy.5

Sandburg prologue excerpt

No verbatim Sandburg passage is associated with this section in data/sections.csv. Per the catalog reconciliation work documented in research/sections.md, the 1955 catalog interior text was access-restricted in the Internet Archive scans consulted in earlier sessions and has not been re-fetched. The sandburg_prologue_excerpt field will be populated when the physical catalog or an unrestricted digital copy can be consulted.

The 74 plates assigned to this cluster, in checklist order. Plate IDs are repository identifiers, not the original 1955 plate numbers; the underlying mapping (e.g. photo-0131 ↔ checklist plate #137) is recorded in each photograph’s catalog notes.

ID Photographer Country Year
photo-0114 Robert Mottar USA —
photo-0115 Photographer unknown USA —
photo-0116 Charles Trieschmann Kenya —
photo-0117 Nat Farbman Bechuanaland —
photo-0118 Robert Capa USSR —
photo-0119 George Silk New Zealand —
photo-0120 Homer Page USA —
photo-0121 Dmitri Kessel Italy —
photo-0122 Henri Cartier-Bresson Indonesia —
photo-0123 Brassai France —
photo-0124 David Duncan Iran —
photo-0125 G. H. Metcalf Ireland —
photo-0126 Dmitri Kessel China —
photo-0127 Dorothea Lange USA —
photo-0128 Le Shu China —
photo-0129 Shizuo Yamamoto Japan —
photo-0130 Ihei Kimura Japan —
photo-0131 Robert Capa USSR —
photo-0132 Edward Clark USA —
photo-0133 Loomis Dean USA —
photo-0134 Jack DeLano USA —
photo-0135 G. H. Metcalf Ireland —
photo-0136 Peter Stackpole Mexico —
photo-0137 Jakob Tuggener Switzerland —
photo-0138 Todd Webb USA —
photo-0139 Abdul Razay Mehta Pakistan —
photo-0140 Gustav Thorlichen Bolivia —
photo-0141 Roy DeCarava USA —
photo-0142 Charles Rotkin USA —
photo-0143 Dmitri Kessel Belgian Congo —
photo-0144 Howard Sochurek India —
photo-0145 Marcos Chamudes Bolivia —
photo-0146 August Sander Germany —
photo-0147 Ernst Haas USA —
photo-0148 Carl Mydans USA —
photo-0149 Frank Scherschel Wales —
photo-0150 Homer Page USA —
photo-0151 Homer Page USA —
photo-0152 Margaret Bourke-White USA —
photo-0153 C. E. Steinheimer USA —
photo-0154 Wermund Bendtsen Denmark —
photo-0155 Walter Sanders Germany —
photo-0156 Dmitri Kessel China —
photo-0157 Wayne Miller USA —
photo-0158 Allan Grant USA —
photo-0159 Allan Grant USA —
photo-0160 Arthur Lavine USA —
photo-0161 Walter B. Lane USA —
photo-0162 Homer Page USA —
photo-0163 Torkel Korling USA —
photo-0164 Fritz Goro USA —
photo-0165 Fritz Goro with Robert Campbell USA —
photo-0166 Gordon Coster USA —
photo-0167 J. R. Everman USA —
photo-0168 Homer Page USA —
photo-0169 Radiation laboratory, University of California USA —
photo-0170 Russell Lee USA —
photo-0171 Gjon Mili USA —
photo-0172 Eva Besnyo Holland —
photo-0173 Barbara Morgan USA —
photo-0174 Bill Brandt England —
photo-0175 Dorothea Lange USA —
photo-0176 Simpson Kalisher USA —
photo-0177 David Duncan Palestine —
photo-0178 Elliott Erwitt USA —
photo-0179 Emil Oborovsky Austria —
photo-0180 Pal-Nils Nilsson Sweden —
photo-0181 Pierre Verger Brazil —
photo-0182 Henri Cartier-Bresson Bali, Indonesia —
photo-0183 Ruth Davis Ivory Coast —
photo-0184 Etienne Sved Egypt —
photo-0185 George Rodger French Equatorial Africa —
photo-0489 William Garnett USA —
photo-0490 Lennart Nilsson Belgian Congo —

Showing 74 plates mapped to sec-work in data/photographs.csv. Anchor: src-moma-exh-0569-master-checklist (MoMA Exhibition #569 master checklist, Tier-1 in-repo).

Cluster boundaries and certainty

The four-section grouping (Sections 14–17) collapses distinctions the checklist preserves: Land is not Work A is not Work B is not Woman’s Work. The cluster boundaries recorded in research/sections.md are recorded as approximate for the Section 14/15 split and for the two out-of-order entries (#168 and #506 assigned to Section 14 Land; #505 assigned to Section 15 Work A), and as canonical for the four-section cluster’s assignment to the mid-flow labor arc. Two plates (photo-0489, photo-0490) are out-of-sequence checklist entries within Sections 14–15; their cluster assignment is approximate rather than canonical.

The critical weight placed on this cluster is substantial. Roland Barthes’s 1957 essay names “work” alongside “birth, death, work, knowledge, play” as universal categories the exhibition presents as imposing “the same types of behaviour” (verbatim per src-barthes-1957, in-repo, read this session via research/photographs/photo-0147.md).6 In Barthes’s reading, this list is the heart of the exhibition’s ideological project — categories whose historicity the show converts into Nature. Longer Barthes passages on the work category specifically would require a fresh fetch of the Mythologies chapter and were NOT consulted in this round. Allan Sekula’s subsequent critique of the “traffic in photographs” extends the argument: the labor images in this section circulate through agencies such as Magnum and Black Star, and through publications such as LIFE, Argosy, and Ladies’ Home Journal, before arriving at MoMA — a circulation history the exhibition frame renders invisible.7

Any curatorial description of this cluster that presents labor as a universal essence without acknowledging the Barthes–Sekula counter-reading reproduces the humanist framing those critics problematized.

  1. MoMA Archives, Edward Steichen at The Family of Man, 1955 — src-moma-archives-highlights-1955. ↩

  2. CNA Luxembourg, The Family of Man, the book of humanity — src-cna-education. ↩

  3. Research note: research/photographs/photo-0131.md, read this session. Sources cited there include src-moma-exh-0569-master-checklist (Tier-1, in-repo), src-icp-capa-archive, and src-nyt-1954-capa-obit. ↩

  4. Research note: research/photographs/photo-0125.md, read this session. Sources cited there include src-moma-exh-0569-master-checklist (Tier-1, in-repo). No additional Tier-1/2 source for G. H. Metcalf was accessed in this round. ↩

  5. Research note: research/photographs/photo-0147.md, read this session. Sources cited there include src-moma-exh-0569-master-checklist (Tier-1, in-repo), src-icp-ernst-haas-archive, and src-haas-estate-biography. ↩

  6. Roland Barthes, “The Great Family of Man,” in Mythologies (1957) — src-barthes-1957. ↩

  7. Allan Sekula, “The Traffic in Photographs,” Art Journal, 1981 — src-sekula-1981. The body text of Sekula 1981 was not accessed in this round (JSTOR returned 403 in prior research sessions); the argument is cited as carried from the in-repo source file, not from a primary reading of the essay’s text in this session. ↩

✏️ Edit this page 🐛 Suggest improvement 💬 Discuss